2011/04/01 by Timo Pukkala, Erkki Lähde, Olavi Laiho +3 · 104 citations
Agricultural and Biological Sciences · Environmental Science · #Agroforestry #Biology #Business #Carbon sequestration #Computer science #Ecology #Economics #Environmental science #Felling #Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies #Forest Management and Policy #Forest ecology and management #Forest management #Forestry #Geography #Net present value #Production (economics) #Profitability index #Ranking (information retrieval) #Taiga
paper · doi:10.1139/x11-009
published in Canadian Journal of Forest Research 41(4), 851-862 (NRC Research Press)
openalex publication_date 2011/04/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/30
The choice between even- and uneven-aged forest management is a topical issue as the negative impacts of clear-felling are being increasingly criticized and the profitability of even-aged management has been questioned. This study compared these management systems in spruce and pine stands in terms of timber, carbon, and bilberry benefits, all of which can be predicted with reasonable accuracy and quantified in terms of money. Management was optimized by maximizing the total net present value (NPV) of the three benefits in a steady-state situation. The currently recommended type of even-aged management was also included in the comparisons. Uneven-aged management was the best in terms of the total NPV and with respect to bilberry benefits (NPV of bilberry harvesting). It was also better than even-aged management in terms of timber benefits when the discount rate was more than 1%. The ranking was less clear in terms of carbon sequestration and discounted carbon benefits.