Does Oil Hinder Democracy?
2001/04/01 by Michael L. Ross · 28 citations
Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Social Sciences · #Natural Resources and Economic Development #International Development and Aid #Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
paper · doi:10.1353/wp.2001.0011
Abstract
Some scholars suggest that the Middle East's oil wealth helps explain its failure to democratize. This article examines three aspects of this “oil impedes democracy” claim. First, is it true? Does oil have a consistendy antidemocratic effect on states, once other factors are accounted for? Second, can this claim be generalized? Is it true only in the Middle East or elsewhere as well? Is it true for other types of mineral wealth and other types of commodity wealth or only for oil? Finally, if oil does have antidemocratic properties, what is the causal mechanism? The author uses pooled time-series cross-national data from 113 states between 1971 and 1997 to show that oil exports are strongly associated with authoritarian rule; that this effect is not limited to the Middle East; and that other types of mineral exports have a similar antidemocratic effect, while other types of commodity exports do not. The author also tests three explanations for this pattern: a “rentier effect,” which suggests that resource-rich governments use low tax rates and patronage to dampen democratic pressures; a “repression effect,” which holds that resource wealth enables governments to strengthen their internal security forces and hence repress popular movements; and a “modernization effect,” which implies that growth that is based on the export of oil and minerals will fail to bring about die social and cultural changes that tend to produce democratic government. He finds at least limited support for all three effects.
Citations
Cited by
- When Authoritarian Regimes Provide Public Goods: Motivation and Capacity
- Coal exploitation and income inequality: Testing the resource curse with econometric analyses of household survey data from northwestern China
- Autocratic Elections
- When do oil autocracies formally commit to climate change mitigation?
- Renting political violence: A political economy of rents, access and violence delegation
- Exploring the democracy-climate nexus: a review of correlations between democracy and climate policy performance
- Theories of Dictatorships: Sub-Types and Explanations
- Examining the Evolution of Cross-National Fiscal Transparency
- Unconditional Loyalty: The Survival of Minority Autocracies
- All that is left is all that matters: the politics of social spending in authoritarian regimes
- Draining the Swamp? Populist leadership and corruption
- Limited partnership: Business, government, civil society, and the public in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI)
- Foreign aid, FDI and the personalization of power in autocracies
- Too Much Development or Not Enough Democracy? Exploring an Anomaly in the Democratization of Post-Communist Countries
- Autocrats and peaceful resignation in the post-Soviet space: is there a political culture explanation?
- War, Rivalry, and State Building in the Middle East
- Constructing a tax culture: why Lagos State’s elites chose taxes over transfers
- The Minimum Hybrid Contract (MHC): Combining legal and blockchain smart\n contracts
- The mahram effect: gender politics and Saudi Arabia
- Domestic Power Consolidation, Leader Survival, and Chinese High-level Visits
- Do Foreign Investors Punish Democracy? Theory and Empirics, 1984–2001
- Introducing public choice in international relations: the Russian invasion of Ukraine
- Social Revolution and Authoritarian Durability
- Resource Abundance and Life Expectancy
- The artefact of the Natural Resources Curse
- Performative Governance
- Entrepreneurship, oil rents and corruption in Middle East and North African countries
- Is Transparency the Key to Reducing Corruption in Resource-Rich Countries?
Related