vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

All for All: Equality, Corruption, and Social Trust

2005/10/01 by Bo Rothstein, Eric M. Uslaner · 1,502 citations
Social Sciences · #Argument (complex analysis) #Government (linguistics) #Inequality #Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies #Language change #Law #Political science #Social Capital and Networks #Social Policy and Reform Studies #Social capital #Social inequality #Social mobility

paper · open access · doi:10.1353/wp.2006.0022

published in World Politics 58(1), 41-72 (Cambridge University Press)

openalex publication_date 2005/10/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/06

Abstract

The importance of social trust has become widely accepted in the social sciences. A number of explanations have been put forward for the stark variation in social trust among countries. Among these, participation in voluntary associations received most attention. Yet there is scant evidence that participation can lead to trust. In this article, the authors examine a variable that has not gotten the attention it deserves in the discussion about the sources of generalized trust, namely, equality. They conceptualize equality along two dimensions: economic equality and equality of opportunity. The omission of both these dimensions of equality in the social capital literature is peculiar for several reasons. First, it is obvious that the countries that score highest on social trust also rank highest on economic equality, namely, the Nordic countries, the Netherlands, and Canada. Second, these countries have put a lot of effort in creating equality of opportunity, not least in regard to their policies for public education, health care, labor market opportunities, and (more recently) gender equality. The argument for increasing social trust by reducing inequality has largely been ignored in the policy debates about social trust. Social capital research has to a large extent been used by several governments and policy organizations to send a message to people that the bad things in their society are caused by too little volunteering. The policy implications that follow from the authors' research is that the low levels of trust and social capital that plague many countries are caused by too little government action to reduce inequality. However, many countries with low levels of social trust and social capital may be stuck in what is known as a social trap . The logic of such a situation is the following. Social trust will not increase because massive social inequality prevails, but the public policies that could remedy this situation cannot be established precisely because there is a genuine lack of trust. This lack of trust concerns both “other people” and the government institutions that are needed to implement universal policies.

Citations

Cited by

Related