2020/07/01 by Marius R. Busemeyer, Kathleen Thelen · 105 citations
Business, Management and Accounting · Social Sciences · #Argument (complex analysis) #Business #Business model #Delegate #Economic system #Economics #Law #Market economy #Marketing #New business development #Political Influence and Corporate Strategies #Political and Economic history of UK and US #Political economy #Political science #Politics #Power (physics) #Private business #Social Policy and Reform Studies #State (computer science)
paper · pdf · doi:10.1017/s004388712000009x
published in World Politics 72(3), 448-480 (Cambridge University Press)
openalex publication_date 2020/07/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/04
ABSTRACT Recent years have seen a revival of debates about the role of business and the sources of business power in postindustrial political economies. Scholarly accounts commonly distinguish between structural sources of business power, connected to its privileged position in capitalist economies, and instrumental sources, related to direct forms of lobbying by business actors. The authors argue that this distinction overlooks an important third source of business power, which they conceptualize as institutional business power. Institutional business power results when state actors delegate public functions to private business actors. Over time, through policy feedback and lock-in effects, institutional business power contributes to an asymmetrical dependence of the state on the continued commitment of private business actors. This article elaborates the theoretical argument behind this claim, providing empirical examples of growing institutional business power in education in Germany, Sweden, and the United States.