2025/01/21 by Nathan H. Feldman · 2 voices
Business, Management and Accounting · Social Sciences · #Political Influence and Corporate Strategies #Political Science Research and Education #Political Theory and Influence
paper · pdf · doi:10.1017/s153759272400269x
openalex publication_date 2025/01/21 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/21
A schism between political theory and the broader discipline frequently shapes political science. How, when, and why did this occur? Deploying new archival evidence, I show how a cadre of leading political theorists between the 1940s and 1970s identified their vocation with humanism, presenting it as eternally opposed to the practices of “positivists” and “methodists.” To tell this story, I focus on key figures, Leo Strauss and Sheldon Wolin, and critical institutions—the Conference for the Study of Political Thought and the journal Political Theory —to recount how political theory went its own way and the consequences of it doing so.