2016/04/25 by Dustin Lazarovici, Daniela Frauchiger, Renato Renner +1 · 6 voices · 335 citations
Computer Science · Physics and Astronomy · #Chaos, Complexity, and Education #Complex Systems and Dynamics #Domain (mathematical analysis) #Open quantum system #Outcome (game theory) #Quantum #Quantum Mechanics and Applications #Quantum information #Quantum probability #Quantum process #Relationship between string theory and quantum field theory #physics.hist-ph #quant-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05739-8
published in Nature Communications 9(1), 3711 (Nature Portfolio) · Comment on Frauchiger, D. & Renner, R. Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself. Nat. Commun. 9, 3711, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05739-8 (2018)
openalex publication_date 2018/09/07 · arxiv created 2018/11/06 · arxiv updated 2018/11/14 · openalex created_date 2019/03/22 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/06
Quantum theory provides an extremely accurate description of fundamental processes in physics. It thus seems likely that the theory is applicable beyond the, mostly microscopic, domain in which it has been tested experimentally. Here, we propose a Gedankenexperiment to investigate the question whether quantum theory can, in principle, have universal validity. The idea is that, if the answer was yes, it must be possible to employ quantum theory to model complex systems that include agents who are themselves using quantum theory. Analysing the experiment under this presumption, we find that one agent, upon observing a particular measurement outcome, must conclude that another agent has predicted the opposite outcome with certainty. The agents' conclusions, although all derived within quantum theory, are thus inconsistent. This indicates that quantum theory cannot be extrapolated to complex systems, at least not in a straightforward manner.